The Critic
12-23-2007, 07:13 PM
I know that the 6th gen Accords have their own share of transmission issues, but CR is saying that the 2002 models are doing fairly well, is this true?
I found two low mileage 2002 Accords, both are SE I4s. One has only 27,000 miles on it, the other has 36,000 miles. Are they worth a look?
This car is for a friend of mine, and her budget is about 10-11k. The other option is to get a 03 Accord, but one that fits her budget would have 75-90k miles on it.
Would I be better off with a very low mileage 02 Accord I4 or a high mileage 03 I4?
Thanks.
Accordlover
12-23-2007, 07:25 PM
I vote high mileage 03 I4 because they require no timing belt changes and have less maintenance required. No tune ups till 120k miles, and all that is is spark plugs, idle adjustment, and misc fluid changes.
LoveLee
12-23-2007, 09:02 PM
i vote, 2002 with low mileage. i have an '02 and havent had any problems with it ,but maybe i just got lucky. ive had it fofr 3 years and not a single thing has gone wrong. i love my car <3
Accordlover
12-23-2007, 09:44 PM
Here's a more broad explanation of my argument.
2002's do have transmission issues. Period. They just do, and it sounds like all she's considering is an automatic.
2003 V6's had some trans problems too, but most were corrected early on by a oil jet kit recall. 4Cyl's are unaffected to my knowledge.
2002 Models require a timing belt change at 105k miles, a ways away, but you can expect to spend $400-$500 for JUST the belt to be replaced. There are other maintenance items that go along with this. The average cost is somewhere around $800-$1000.
Should her transmission fail (more-so, when it DOES fail cause it really is a design flaw) she can expect to dish out $3k + for a reman unit if its not good-willed or warranted by Honda.
Like I said, there's no timing belt to replace, and there's also no spark plug wires or distributor to replace. Just the plugs and they're not required to be replaced until upwards of 100k.
The K24 is a much more efficient engine and is much more sophisticated than the 2.3L F-Series in the 02 Accord which is based off of a 17yr old engine design as of present.
The 5spd automatic transmission in the 03+ Accord is also nicer on the highway vs. the 4spd automatic on the 02.
The 03 Accord is safer and can be equipped with side curtain airbags, the 02 cannot.
I think a simple test drive of the two cars will prove to her that the 03 is a much better car. Even if it does have high miles. Freeway miles are much easier on a car than city miles.