View Full Version : outlawing distractions


princess
03-18-2006, 10:40 AM
March 18, 2006 — Drinking a latte, talking on the phone or even turning around to discipline the kids while driving could soon be a crime in Winnetka, Ill.

Violators would pay up to $750 in fines.

$750 for "coffee and looking back at your children?" said Alberto Paracchini, a Winnetka resident. "That sounds a bit extreme to me."

Jenny Cleary, a mother of three, including 2-year-old twins, said avoiding distraction with a car full of kids seems impossible.

"I'm drinking a cup of coffee, yelling to sit down get in your car seat, stop fighting … all those different things at one time," she said. "But I don't really think it distracts from my driving."

The police chief who drew up the proposal would argue otherwise.

"What I'm advocating," Police Chief Joseph De Lopez said, "is making the public more aware of their responsibility to be attentive drivers — to minimize the danger they pose to themselves and others when they're driving."

Distracted drivers cause an estimated 1.2 million accidents a year. In fact, 46 percent of drivers surveyed by the American Automobile Association admitted to putting on make up, shaving or doing some sort of personal grooming behind the wheel. Seventy-one percent said they eat or drink and 92 percent said they fiddle with the radio. Yet the cell phone is the main culprit.

Laws Across the Country

At least 17 states have laws that restrict the use of handheld cell phones behind the wheel, but studies show that has done little to reduce the accidents.

"We try to advocate that motorists use common sense," said Kris Lathan of AAA. "Necessarily having two hands on the wheel doesn't matter if your mind's not on the road."

That is why Connecticut, the District of Columbia and New Hampshire fine drivers for other distractions that lead to a crash.

Town leaders in Winnetka are still talking about whether they could enforce such a law. If nothing else, this proposal gives drivers cause to think about what they're not thinking about when they're on the road.

**************************************


:paranoid:

stiller fan
03-18-2006, 10:47 AM
Town leaders in Winnetka are still talking about whether they could enforce such a law. If nothing else, this proposal gives drivers cause to think about what they're not thinking about when they're on the road.

**************************************


:paranoid:

exactly my point..... how can you enforce that law w/o more litigation??? it's almost like the speed limit in montana back then: "resonable and prudent".... :dunno: :stupid:

beng
03-18-2006, 11:08 AM
Can't help but notice that there is no mention of smoking in the article. I think smoking while driving is much more dangerous than using a cel phone. Afterall, how many cel users throw their burning phones out the window, then have that same burning phone start a fire, further distracting the drivers behind them? Or drop their burning phone in the car and have it burn them or anything else in the car. If you take it further, how many times have you pulled into a parking stall only to find that someone before you has left a pile of butts right where there driver's door opens up. I've never found a pile of cel phones in a parking stall :) At least with talking on the phone, you can use technology (handsfree kit) to keep both hands available for the wheel.

stiller fan
03-18-2006, 11:18 AM
if they are going to do that, you may as well take out the radio too then..... big distraction there as well.... :rolleyes:

princess
03-18-2006, 12:24 PM
According to the statistics, you're right..ANYTHING involving using your hands....eating, smoking, etc. falls high on the list... but with cell phones the majority of accidents related to them happen within 5 minutes AFTER hanging up. They think it's because of the mind being on the conversation... :dunno: If that's true, hands free doesn't matter. I don't let my prince have much of a conversation using his hands free in the Pilot. :)

Kids ARE a big distraction for some. The boys are always belted in with whatever their choice was to play with in my car. It's not the same with their parents. When they are first loading into mine, it's grab your choice of sunglasses, & game, then buckle up. I shut the door before I load myself up. (mostly the fingerprint factor....but it's a good way to make sure they're all buckled in too)

BenjiBoy650
03-18-2006, 12:27 PM
I wonder when they're gonna outlaw diggin yer nose :lmao:

stiller fan
03-18-2006, 12:35 PM
:notworthy

:lmao:

princess
03-18-2006, 01:50 PM
I think THAT'S more distracting to the other drivers!!! :D

edwilson13185
03-18-2006, 02:36 PM
They made hands free kits mandatory while driving in my home county (Randolph in IL) a couple of years ago. It doesn't seem to be enforced that strictly. I don't see how it's really possible to stop people from having a beverage with them in the car, either. And kids? What are they going to do about that one?

I think a better alternative would be some kind of education regarding the importance of being distraction-free (or as much as is possible) while behind the wheel. This could be done through direct mailings, billboard advertising, ads in the paper, and/or spots on the radio (which would probably be the most effective option). I think that would be a lot more effective at getting the message across than trying to pull over everyone who had a bottle of water in the car (and taking the police officers away from other, more important duties in the process).

princess
03-18-2006, 02:43 PM
Yep.....enforcing creates a whole new can of worms!!

They can't keep DUIs off the road & they think they're gonna be able to keep people from yelling at their kids?! Then there's if they didn't yell, the kid could be going to do something dangerous!

I just don't think this form of stupid proofing can work!! :)

SSMV6
03-18-2006, 03:08 PM
I wonder when they're gonna outlaw diggin yer nose :lmao:
Things on the top of the list:

Scratching an itch with your hands....
Looking at signs....
Turning your head to do head checks....
Holding the steering wheel... :eek: :lmao:

princess
03-18-2006, 03:10 PM
Now SOME of those itches CAN be dangerous!!! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :paranoid:

stiller fan
03-18-2006, 03:27 PM
hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, what kind of itches are we talking about here????? :lmao: :nuts:

BenjiBoy650
03-18-2006, 04:43 PM
hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, what kind of itches are we talking about here????? :lmao: :nuts:
When I get a itch on the bottom of my foot, I just floor it :thumbsup:

stiller fan
03-18-2006, 04:46 PM
don't we all??? :naughty: :D

princess
03-18-2006, 04:54 PM
those foot itches can be tricky!! :yes:

stiller fan
03-18-2006, 04:57 PM
yeah, and long-lasting too.....

i get those alot in city traffic, and it gets especially bad when driving to and from norfolk, va..... i think that it's a common problem, especially on i-95... alot of drivers in a row tend to have that problem, aka they travel in groups (group therapy???)....

Spades
03-18-2006, 06:50 PM
Exactly, Princess! They cannot control DUI and they are already moving on to the lesser offenses. So much more serious stuff is happening all around the country and when you see cops wasting their time to write a ticket to some guy doing 10 over it really makes you wonder...

beng
03-18-2006, 11:14 PM
Check out http://robots.engadget.com/2006/01/30/honda-accord-adas-auto-pilot-system-takes-the-reins/ Looks like Honda's trying to stupid proof our cars :)

stevencrosbie
03-19-2006, 04:30 AM
Check out http://robots.engadget.com/2006/01/30/honda-accord-adas-auto-pilot-system-takes-the-reins/ Looks like Honda's trying to stupid proof our cars :)

Yuck! The reason I buy Hondas is because I like how they drive. If I had to buy a car that I was always a passenger.....I'd buy a Toyota :yes:

MasTRE
03-19-2006, 12:30 PM
They should outlaw tolls too for those of us who don't like to use easypass (or equiv).. Getting your wallet out as you slow down can be very dangerous..