9G purchase dilemma: color combinations, manual tranny, and CVT - Drive Accord Honda Forums

Go Back   Drive Accord Honda Forums > Honda Accord Main Forums > the 9th Generation

Drive Honda Accord Forums
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2012, 06:18 PM
atomiclightbulb atomiclightbulb is offline
3rd Gear
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 170
9G purchase dilemma: color combinations, manual tranny, and CVT

I'm pretty much sold on upgrading my 7G Accord to a 9G Accord at some point, but I'm struggling a bit with whether to stay with a manual tranny, or move over to the CVT.

There are two new factors at play for me here: color combinations, and fuel economy. I have driven an Accord with a manual for a long time.

My Accord SE has a silver exterior, and I want something different next time, maybe Basque Red or the new Champagne Frost. Unfortunately, the 9G Accord Sedan is only available with the 6MT in two colors: Alabaster Silver, and Modern Steel (evolved Polished Metal?), both of which have a black interior. I don't want silver again, and I think that Modern Steel with a black interior is a bit too drab, and also too hot in the summer season. The color chart was posted in this thread at vtec.net: http://vtec.net/forums/one-message?m...tem_id=1091517

Also, the fuel economy for the 6MT models is noticeably lower than the CVT models: 24 city 34 highway 28 combined for the 6MT, compared to 27 city 36 highway 30 combined for the CVT. Fuel economy is important to me, and has been a secondary reason that I've drive manual for most of my life. Historically, the manuals beat the automatics in fuel economy, but I'm not so sure this will be the case going forward.

So it comes down to this: I like rowing my own gears. But I can't row my own gears and have a good choice of color combinations. And I want to take advantage of more efficient technology, but only the CVT offers big rather than incremental gains over my current vehicle (which rates 23 city, 31 highway, and 26 combined -- I4+5MT model).

Either way I choose I will be mildly dissatisfied.

For practical reasons I cannot buy the coupe, and I don't want the expense of the V6 model either.

For those of you who plan on buying a 9G, what are your thoughts?

The only way I see out of this is to go CVT on the Accord, which will be my daily driver, and buy a Subaru BR-Z for fun. The wife is sure to veto the second part of this plan, however
__________________
'07 Accord SE sedan, I4+5MT
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 09-13-2012, 06:54 PM
Rattmann Rattmann is offline
5th Gear
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 890
KEEP AWAY FROM CVT.
Honda did not design a dependable CVT, but borrowed a lower quality grade from Nissan!!

Dont be a test dummy for the 1st model year CVT
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2012, 07:39 PM
namegoeshere's Avatar
namegoeshere namegoeshere is offline
. . . . ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ . . . .
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,811
Where are you getting info that CVT in the Accord is a "lower quality grade" CVT borrowed from Nissan?

The CVT should be Honda's own design.

- http://world.honda.com/news/2012/412...les/print.html
- http://www.greencarcongress.com/2012...201200405.html
- http://world.honda.com/automobile-te...gy/CVT/detail/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2012, 04:30 AM
Mechanic Mechanic is offline
4th Gear
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 367
ALB, as I read the color chart, the 6-spd. MT Sport is will only available in Crystal Black and Modern Steel. I happen to like the latter, but Honda's decision to limit the color choice in this manner almost ensures the take rate for the MT will be next to nothing. Really strange. In a perfect world, the Sport model would be available in Modena Red/black interior, come standard with the HFP suspension package, have an LSD and decent rubber, and very different gear ratios in the 6-spd MT. Not gonna happen.

And, I was on the verge of taking you to task for even considering the CVT -- i.e., any automatic transmission -- with the Sport model, but given the gargantuan spread between the 2nd and 3rd gear ratios in the MT, the CVT may actually be more satisfying to drive in a daily driver.

Finally, if you're asking for opinions WRT colors, I'd avoid Champagne Frost.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2012, 04:42 AM
plunk10 plunk10 is offline
2nd Deer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 379
Just remember, it's a lot easier to reach the EPA estimates with a manual, than with an automatic.

In my experiences of driving, I can usually match the EPA numbers driving normally with a manual. To even come close to EPA with a CVT or any automatic, one must truly drive like grandma.

The only '13 Accord I've seen in person was the red color, which is a beautiful color in my opinion.
__________________
2004 Accord Sedan EX-L 2.4 5spd manual.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-14-2012, 06:37 AM
namegoeshere's Avatar
namegoeshere namegoeshere is offline
. . . . ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ . . . .
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,811
^ Not anymore. The CVT should give you better MPG now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2012, 07:12 AM
kvndoom's Avatar
kvndoom kvndoom is offline
Should've kept the Honda
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tidewater, Virginia
Posts: 875
I seriously see a 2016 or 2017 Blue 6/6 coupe in my future...
__________________
Honda of America: "Sorry folks, we don't waste our paint on manual-shift cars."
5/31/11 - 10/1/12: 2011 White EX-L 6/6 coupe w/nav http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn-enjcgV1o
Current: 2011 Nissan Juke SL 6MT, 2005 Ford Focus ST 5MT
I shift with PEDALS, not PADDLES.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-14-2012, 07:35 AM
Amperex Amperex is offline
2nd Gear
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 76
I owned a Nissan Maxima with CVT- never again a CVT.

I own a 6CYL Accord VCM that drones annoyingly in 3CYL mode- never again VCM.

Your choice is obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2012, 08:46 AM
atomiclightbulb atomiclightbulb is offline
3rd Gear
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechanic View Post
ALB, as I read the color chart, the 6-spd. MT Sport is will only available in Crystal Black and Modern Steel. I happen to like the latter, but Honda's decision to limit the color choice in this manner almost ensures the take rate for the MT will be next to nothing.
Ah yes, you are correct about the Sport trim colors. Black exterior + black interior is also unfortunately a no go for me. Way too hot in the summertime.

Quote:
And, I was on the verge of taking you to task for even considering the CVT -- i.e., any automatic transmission -- with the Sport model, but given the gargantuan spread between the 2nd and 3rd gear ratios in the MT, the CVT may actually be more satisfying to drive in a daily driver.
Yeah. I guess I'd have to test drive to know for sure.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Amperex View Post
I owned a Nissan Maxima with CVT- never again a CVT.

I own a 6CYL Accord VCM that drones annoyingly in 3CYL mode- never again VCM.

Your choice is obvious.
The Honda CVT feels nothing like the Nissan CVT, by the account of pretty much every website and magazine that has driven the '13 Accord. My only question is long term reliability.

The new V6 has pretty much transparent VCM, and it also has real VTEC back, with the hi/lo cam profiles that were absent from the 8th Gen sedan's V6. However, the V6 is also pretty much out of the question for me -- too nose heavy. I don't need the straight line power.

I don't plan on replacing my 7G Accord for at least another 2 years, so I'm in no rush. I just like to see what my options are for the future. So far I like the 9G Accord much better than the Altima, and I don't particularly care for the styling of the new Fusion.
__________________
'07 Accord SE sedan, I4+5MT
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-14-2012, 01:41 PM
fastball fastball is offline
Honda Nation
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattmann View Post
KEEP AWAY FROM CVT.
Honda did not design a dependable CVT, but borrowed a lower quality grade from Nissan!!

Dont be a test dummy for the 1st model year CVT
While I cannot attest to it's performance or how reliable it will be, the fact is the CVT in the Accord is built by Honda.

The CVT in the Accord is of Honda's own design, and it is built in their Anna, Ohio drive train plant. As a lifelong Ohio resident and long time Honda owner and enthusiast I can assure you I follow the company's projects in Marysville, Anna, and East Liberty Ohio.

I've noticed you tend to post a lot of "information" on this forum which you pull from left field and claim to be fact. Moderators need to watch you.
__________________
May 2009 - Present: 2009 Accord V6 6 MT coupe w/o nav, Alabaster Silver

Dec. 1999 - May 2010: 2000 Prelude 5 MT, sold with 220,000 miles and still running great - gone, but not forgotten
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-14-2012, 04:27 PM
Amperex Amperex is offline
2nd Gear
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 76
Accelerating aggressively while getting on the highway, the Honda CVT will behave like a CVT. The engine will rev annoyingly high and you will tire of this type of driving experience rather quickly. Stay away-far far away from any car with a CVT.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-14-2012, 04:36 PM
CFaccord45's Avatar
CFaccord45 CFaccord45 is offline
4th Gear
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amperex View Post
Accelerating aggressively while getting on the highway, the Honda CVT will behave like a CVT. The engine will rev annoyingly high and you will tire of this type of driving experience rather quickly. Stay away-far far away from any car with a CVT.
But if you're like a regular person that doesn't always hits the pedal to the metal when entering a highway, instead of slowly accelerating you will probaly barely notice the rpms go high, besides the new 2.4 has peak torque at lows rpms (approx 3k) so it should acquire good speed with light press on the gas
__________________
2009 Accord LX-P Sedan PMM
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-14-2012, 06:59 PM
ssmtsx ssmtsx is online now
4th Gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 209
Send a message via AIM to ssmtsx
Quote:
Originally Posted by kvndoom View Post
I seriously see a 2016 or 2017 Blue 6/6 coupe in my future...
it looks like the american 6/6 coupe is only going to come in black red or gray.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-14-2012, 07:59 PM
jshaw jshaw is offline
4th Gear
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 360
I typed a much longer post, but long story short:


The easiest way would be to convince Honda to add a manual special order option to the range topper. An Accord i4 EX-L is already running 30k today, a V6 is not much over that.



*BUT*, RWD options are aplenty with more power and less cost (coupes) and a bit more cost (though not as well equipped at that price, sedans).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-14-2012, 08:06 PM
h2pvnus h2pvnus is online now
5th Gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattmann View Post
KEEP AWAY FROM CVT.
Honda did not design a dependable CVT, but borrowed a lower quality grade from Nissan!!

Dont be a test dummy for the 1st model year CVT
There are some video review said that honda new CVT is way better than any competitor CVT
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.