What a shame one of the great car companies will be remembered for such an unmemorable design.
Honda finally lived down to the opinions of all their naysayers.
It is, in a way. Some of us had hope that with the 11th G and high hopes in general… I think it’s fair to say we’ve expected a bit too much from this new gen.
With that being said, I’ll reserve my final opinion of this gen until after the MMC for this Accord. In any case, I doubt Honda would throw away a four decade long nameplate just like that. This car, along with the Civic, were Honda’s bread and butter cars for the longest time. They made Honda what Honda is today. Yes, the torch has been passed on to the CR-V, but that doesn’t mean it can’t coexist along with it. If anything, I hope the nameplate lives on, even if it means it’ll only be available as an electric car in the future.
Last month, the Accord accounted for only 16% of the total number of units sold (and less than that in terms of revenue). The Accord and Civic together accounted for only one-third (32%) of Honda's total sales.
Ten years ago, the Accord accounted for 30% of sales. The Accord and Civic accounted for over half (52%) of Honda's sales.
20 years ago, sedans and coupes accounted for nearly two-thirds (65%) of Honda's sales.
While the Accord name is memorable and was an important part of Honda's past, it is less important to Honda's future. Fiesta, Focus, Escort, Pinto, LTD, Grenada, Thunderbird, Crown Victoria, Probe, Taurus, Model T, Model A, Tempo, Coutour, and Galaxie were all an important names to Ford at one time. Today, they're mostly irrelevant.
All the car companies are under pressure to meet government demands for mileage, and that's why Honda wants 50% to be hybrids. As an apartment dweller, I can tell you that does not compute.
What is the disconnection between a hybrid and being an apartment dweller?