I Disagree: When the MAF sees more air it will add more fuel (to a point), thus more power. Our Honda computers are very smart, they wont run lean N.A.
F.I. is another matter. I know many guys with bolt on mods, been to the dyno, air/fuel ratio good, and made a lot more power. I have NEVER heard of any lean issues or damage from bolt on's in our cars.:wave:
The MAF is only measuring a fraction of the airflow going through the intake and it is calibrated using the complete intake assembly.
The extreme example would be to tranplant the MAF in a 10in diameter tube. Thw MAF signal would be meaningless as it only "feels" the air immediately around itself.
The air flow behaviour will be different with a CAI or SRI. It has to be if any change to power are claimed.
The ECU is smart but it is blind and cannot recognize a change in intake configuration.
Like I said in a different topic, this is taken straight from the guy who calibrates OEM ECU. Intake mods are "less safe" than exhaust mod because the ECU can be fooled that way.
Not to say any given engine will blow up because of a CAI. Simply a heads up on what it might do.
As for the gains, the numbers seen are really close to the dyno's actual resolution. From run to run, 1-2% variation is common.
A bolt ON mod needs to yield a lot more power in order for us to reliabily say it is effective.