Joined
·
2,019 Posts
Perhaps I shouldn't have titled this as a question. Most folks probably realize this, but I had the misconception that the 7 year replacement requirement applied to all of the 7th gen. And of course I realize the mileage intervals that also apply. I personally may have misunderstood since we own a 03 in addition to my 06.
Anyhow, I kind of wonder why Honda made the change to their recommended service requirements? I can think of 4 reasons why they might have done so:
1. They changed the belt specifications so the timing belt isn't prone to failure based on age.
2. Honda's internal statistics or experience indicated that 7th gen timing belts were not failing due to age.
3. The maintenance minder is sufficient to determine when the belt needs to be changed.
4. Honda erred in omitting the 7 yr requirement or was overly influenced by marketing considerations.
My car exceeded 7 yrs as of 10-2013 and I did confirm that there is no pending maintenance minder sub-code 4 that would call for a timing belt replacement and my mileage is under 60,000 miles. As an aside, I didn't change the belt on my wife's 03 until the car was 9 years old - - mostly due to procrastination. And I don't mean to recommend that anyone not follow the recommended service intervals.
Reading a recent thread caused me to realize my misunderstanding related to the different service interval requirements applicable to the 06-07 Accords vs. the 03-05's. Since I was finally taking my car in for the power steering hose recall I was also going to have the timing belt-water pump replaced at the same time. Whew - - that's going to save me a good chunk of money for now!
Anyhow, I kind of wonder why Honda made the change to their recommended service requirements? I can think of 4 reasons why they might have done so:
1. They changed the belt specifications so the timing belt isn't prone to failure based on age.
2. Honda's internal statistics or experience indicated that 7th gen timing belts were not failing due to age.
3. The maintenance minder is sufficient to determine when the belt needs to be changed.
4. Honda erred in omitting the 7 yr requirement or was overly influenced by marketing considerations.
My car exceeded 7 yrs as of 10-2013 and I did confirm that there is no pending maintenance minder sub-code 4 that would call for a timing belt replacement and my mileage is under 60,000 miles. As an aside, I didn't change the belt on my wife's 03 until the car was 9 years old - - mostly due to procrastination. And I don't mean to recommend that anyone not follow the recommended service intervals.
Reading a recent thread caused me to realize my misunderstanding related to the different service interval requirements applicable to the 06-07 Accords vs. the 03-05's. Since I was finally taking my car in for the power steering hose recall I was also going to have the timing belt-water pump replaced at the same time. Whew - - that's going to save me a good chunk of money for now!