[tmnipu27]

Is it true that the 9th Generation engine is 2013-2017 have a naturally aspirated engine? They are better that the 1.5 and 2.0 turbo engines? I'm thinking of selling my 22 Honda Accord Sport 2.0t and getting a 9th generation 2.4.

 

[HondaBob]

I seem to remember reading that the 2.0 turbo was a lot better than the 1.5, but I don't know how the 2.0 compares to 9th gen Accords.

 

[WiiMaster]

I would take a 2.0T over the 2.4L any day.

 

[RCarlL]

Is it true that the 9th Generation engine is 2013-2017 have a naturally aspirated engine? They are better that the 1.5 and 2.0 turbo engines? I'm thinking of selling my 22 Honda Accord Sport 2.0t and getting a 9th generation 2.4.

The 9th Generation (2013-2017) came with two engines- a 2.4L naturally aspirated four cylinder or a 3.5L naturally aspirated V6. Both are engines that seem to be pretty reliable as long as you maintain them.

The 10th Generation (2018-2022) came with two different engines- both turbocharged. There was the base 1.5L turbo that seems like it can develop some issues as it ages and the 2.0L turbo motor that seems like it is pretty reliable (so far).

Which ones are better- that's a matter of debate- and there will be lots of people with different opinions. The 2.4L engine used in 2013-2017 was reliable, but most of them used a CVT that wasn't to everyone's liking. It seems like the CVT is one of the more reliable ones though. The V6 used a traditional transmission.

Many people don't like modern turbos- but I really liked the 2.0t motor in my 2019 and 2021 Accords. Both were connected to a 10-speed automatic that shifted pretty smoothly. The 1.5L turbo used in 2018-2022 was connected to a CVT, again, with not everyone liking it.

I also had a 2.4L (2016) Accord- and it was fine to drive and it was perfectly reliable. The 2.0t engine in my 2019 and 2021 Accords had a lot more grunt- and was a lot more fun to drive.

Your budget will likely be the determining factor here. While the 2.0L turbo engine in the 2018-2022 Accord is a great powertrain- they are expensive on the used market unless you find one with higher miles- they are also a bit harder to find compared to Accords with the base power plant.. There are plenty of 2.4L (2013-2017) Accords on the market- so they tend to be more affordable- both because of the amount available and because they are older and were lower-priced when they were new.

Personally, I'd avoid a 2018+ Accord with the 1.5L turbo powertrain- but that's just my opinion.

 

[Hudouc]

Is it better? I don't know. Having only driven both briefly on test drives, I would pick your car over a 2.4L 9th gen.
What I can tell you is that the K24W does have it's own problem. The tensioner and VTC rattle is famous on that car. While not catastrophic immediately, they both need to be addressed during your ownership. Having done the tensioner on a friend's 9th gen and the tensioner and VTC actuator on my 8th gen. It can get expensive if you can not DIY.

Want to get rid of your 10th gen for cheap? Feel free to give me a call.

 

[Mr.Cannon]

I have a 9th gen K24 and have driven the 10th gen 1.5t & 2.0t. The K24 drives better than the 1.5t and being a K series I have far more faith in it than the extremely varied reliability of the 1.5t. The 2.0t is a monster of a motor capable of the same gas mileage of the K24 and I'm keeping an eye out for a good deal on a 10g 2.0t because it's good all around car. I'd argue the only reasons to have a 9g over a 10g is less risk of theft, and, getting away from the 1.5t.

I find your questions strange since Google and Wikipedia exist and you're capable of test driving a 9th gen to see how you like it. So....Google some stuff and visit a dealer perhaps?

 

[Honda2014]

K24 in general is likely going to be more reliable than the 2.0t long term (100k+), but the 2.0t is definitely more fun. I had around 10 years/160k+ miles of ownership experience with variants of K24. Plus driving other Hondas (TSX, ILX etc) with K24 here and there on numerous occasions. They drive well, even torquey, I’d say, compared to most NA 4 bangers. No issues whatsoever.

As mentioned, the thing with 9th gen. K24 is most come with a CVT, whether that’s a positive depends on one’s perspective. To me, I prefer the 2.0t/10AT combination to K24/CVT. If you want efficiency, the latter wins.

Of course, you can also have the best of both worlds by getting a K24 with 6MT, but those are becoming rare to come by, especially if you want one in great shape with low miles.

 

[KW2004Accord]

Is it true that the 9th Generation engine is 2013-2017 have a naturally aspirated engine? They are better that the 1.5 and 2.0 turbo engines? I'm thinking of selling my 22 Honda Accord Sport 2.0t and getting a 9th generation 2.4.

Do you like driving a cvt along with a lot less hp ? Look for a 2017 V6, then disable the vcm or just keep what you have.

 

[GoGators]

2.0T seems well regarded, going to be sought after as time goes on. Keep it if you like it, there are plenty of 2.4’s around. I like my 2.4 for putting a ton of miles. Hoping for 300k and beyond, currently 226k.

 

[14v6]

It would be 1.5t versus 2.4 or
2.0t vs. 3.5V6.

I've had plenty of 2.4's and 3.5's but never had the turbo. I had a 1.5t as a loaner in a CRV and it was meh. Considering that the 2.4's ran forever, wasn't about to enter the turbo realm and will never have to since hybrids are out.

 

[tmnipu27]

Well, I ended up selling it. It's expensive on gas and oil changes. I really didn't want to trust the turbo engines in the long run. I really wanted to get rid of the car payments or pay off something alot sooner. New cars are expensive. So far I like the 9th Gen 2015 Accord Ex-l. It reminds me of the 2018 Ex-l that i had. It just less expensive.

 

[DerekWildstar]

@stiller fan could give you several reasons why he ditched his 10th gen to go back to a 2.4L 9th gen.

 

[stiller fan]

@stiller fan could give you several reasons why he ditched his 10th gen to go back to a 2.4L 9th gen.

Do we have enough space left on the forum servers? 🤣

 

[seldomseen]

Is it true that the 9th Generation engine is 2013-2017 have a naturally aspirated engine? They are better that the 1.5 and 2.0 turbo engines? I'm thinking of selling my 22 Honda Accord Sport 2.0t and getting a 9th generation 2.4.

See if you can locate a low mileage '17 Accord Touring (V6) in pristine condition. Which is far superior than the 10th gen Accord.

 

[tmnipu27]

@stiller fan could give you several reasons why he ditched his 10th gen to go back to a 2.4L 9th gen.

So, I'm a woman. The 10th gen sport. 2.0t is expensive on gas and oil changes. The infotainment system acted up. One minute it will connect and then it would say device is not compatible. It was strange. I originally wanted to sell to not have any car payments anymore. If i was going to get something i wanted to pay it off alot sooner. I like the body style and it has power but i don't think its worth all that money. The turbo engines a have alot more parts esp. moving parts that can bring down over time which can be even more costly. So i have the 2015 Honda Accord Ex-l. It reminds alot like the 2018 Honda Accord Ex-l just without the oil dilution. Though its older its two trim levels up and the cost is cheaper to maintain. The interior is way more comfortable and softer. I love my auto dimming rear-view mirror. I can't wait to put some tint and new wheels on it. Plus i can pay it off alot sooner and than the 22' Honda Accord Sport 2.0t. New isn't always better.

 

[Justinga99]

You can't go wrong with the 9th gen. It's a solid and very reliable car. Turbo engines shouldn't be scary as they've been around for a long time.

I'm curious what all you're considering when saying "cheaper to maintain". Just the oil changes and cost of fuel?

Also the 9th gen has it's own infotainment system issues. Ours cuts out everytime we have carplay running gps and music. Many others have reported same issues with no fix.

Lastly, very wise of you to go for the financially more efficient route while still getting into a vehicle you like. Enjoy the 2015!

 

[Dstok]

My opinion is that the 10th gen 2.0t is the only engine that can perform reliably enough for me to consider one for long term. The gas part I don't see as expensive I.e My previous touring 2.0t ran on average 27-30 miles regularly and 35-37 on long highway drives. My current 17 v6 coupe on a daily about 20-22 and long trips around 28-29. Maintenance on the coupe is pricey so idk about saving on that lol

 

[stiller fan]

You can't go wrong with the 9th gen. It's a solid and very reliable car. Turbo engines shouldn't be scary as they've been around for a long time.

I'm curious what all you're considering when saying "cheaper to maintain". Just the oil changes and cost of fuel?

Also the 9th gen has it's own infotainment system issues. Ours cuts out everytime we have carplay running gps and music. Many others have reported same issues with no fix.

Lastly, very wise of you to go for the financially more efficient route while still getting into a vehicle you like. Enjoy the 2015!

Yeah. This and previous 9th gen would always have the Bluetooth crash at 35m 30s, like clockwork. Transferring the call to phone and then back to car is a workaround.

The Bluetooth leaves a lot to be desired. But, it seems like with each generation of accord, there is something that I don't like, but that I can live with.

 

[tmnipu27]

So far mine connects seamlessly better than my 22" Sport 2.0t.