Is there any major differences between these years?
I'm looking for a used car this summer and comparing these years but also comparing civics of similar years.
But, I thought I should really consider the Accord although I think the main difference is that the '02 had better safety specs.
Also, I read mixed reviews on tranny, from it's car-to-car and depends if it was abused and also recommendations to buy a tranny cooler (where do you get those - the dealer or a Japanese import shop or?) if you get an auto. Of course, others insist that you don't risk it and go for a manual/5spd and call it a day. The problem is restricting the search to only 5spd, makes it harder to find a decent car - in decent shape - but also manual transmission.
The Civics '96 - '02 (I'll probably look at '03 and maybe '04, too) don't have as widespread an auto tranny issue?
Another reason, I'm inclined to prefer the Accord is that it has more hp and as long as I just look at LX and EX, it will have plenty (148 or 150) whereas most Civics will be 106hp unless I find LX and EX?
I'm in Canada.
Both models have rust and rust around the wheel well and quarter panel - and for both, here, the mileage is often close to 300K km or more. So, it will be difficult to find a cheap car in decent shape. I don't mind fixing and some repairs but nothing major.
I am told that the '00 to '02 Accords are pretty reliable/maintenance free (relatively speaking - nothing major but mostly routine/typical repairs) but that's just with standard shift/manual versions and a bit of suspension and possibly pain issues.
Comments?
Thanks for any info/insight/advice.
I'm looking for a used car this summer and comparing these years but also comparing civics of similar years.
But, I thought I should really consider the Accord although I think the main difference is that the '02 had better safety specs.
Also, I read mixed reviews on tranny, from it's car-to-car and depends if it was abused and also recommendations to buy a tranny cooler (where do you get those - the dealer or a Japanese import shop or?) if you get an auto. Of course, others insist that you don't risk it and go for a manual/5spd and call it a day. The problem is restricting the search to only 5spd, makes it harder to find a decent car - in decent shape - but also manual transmission.
The Civics '96 - '02 (I'll probably look at '03 and maybe '04, too) don't have as widespread an auto tranny issue?
Another reason, I'm inclined to prefer the Accord is that it has more hp and as long as I just look at LX and EX, it will have plenty (148 or 150) whereas most Civics will be 106hp unless I find LX and EX?
I'm in Canada.
Both models have rust and rust around the wheel well and quarter panel - and for both, here, the mileage is often close to 300K km or more. So, it will be difficult to find a cheap car in decent shape. I don't mind fixing and some repairs but nothing major.
I am told that the '00 to '02 Accords are pretty reliable/maintenance free (relatively speaking - nothing major but mostly routine/typical repairs) but that's just with standard shift/manual versions and a bit of suspension and possibly pain issues.
Comments?
Thanks for any info/insight/advice.