Honda Accord Forums - The DriveAccord community is where Honda Accord 2003+ owners can discuss reviews, service, parts, and share mods. banner
1 - 20 of 77 Posts

II Kings 9:20

· Registered
Joined
·
5,432 Posts
Reaction score
448
Three things I glean from the report:

1. Turbo lag is "minimal" (not zero).

2. Peak hp and torque arrive earlier than the V6 (no surprise since it's a turbo).

3. Rumors of the demise of the manual transmission are greatly exaggerated. It survives (I know of one member who will be greatly disappointed)

Interesting read albeit a limited review, but it is the first actual drive to date.

Edit: Thanks for adding the article namegh, I should have thought to do that. in addition to the link.

http://www.automobilemag.com/news/s...accords-new-powertrain/?_wcsid=BFBD2F195104BD0619B31E6DC7785DA4EFC16BA17B1F6FE5

Sampling the 2018 Honda Accord’s New Powertrain

We (briefly) get behind the wheel of a 10th-generation prototype

June 9, 2017

Togichi, Japan - Wrapped in camouflage, its cabin swaddled in obfuscating black cloth, Honda’s next-generation Accord is nearing the end of its march toward production. We visited Honda’s global research and development center this week to drive an engine and transmission development prototype of the car ahead of its arrival on U.S. roads later this year. Given the Accord’s central role to Honda’s automotive efforts, the company absolutely has to get it right. On this trip, we got our first chance to find out if they did.

The 10th-generation Accord will ditch the V-6 available in its predecessors, opting instead for a 2.0-liter turbocharged, direct-injected, dual overhead cam i-VTEC four-cylinder as its top power producer. Forged connecting rods, a forged crankshaft, improved cylinder head and block water pathways, and sodium-filled exhaust valves give the 2.0-liter additional durability and power capability. A 1.5-liter turbo-four (essentially the same engine available in the latest Civic) will also be offered, as well as a two-motor hybrid. Both turbo-fours will be offered with a choice of a six-speed manual transmission or an all-new, Honda-developed 10-speed automatic transmission. The 10-speed auto is capable of transmitting 20 percent more torque than the outgoing six-speed auto, but weighs 10 percent less. The two-motor hybrid needs no transmission thanks to its unique design.

Front-wheel drive is the only option for the 2018 Accord, says American Honda’s regulatory, legal, and technology communications manager Chris Martin, because customers who want all-wheel drive also tend to want the higher ride height and ground clearance of a crossover — and Honda makes plenty of those already.

To put the new Accord’s powertrain to the test, Honda handed us the keys to a prototype fitted with the 2.0-liter engine and 10-speed automatic. The prototype was built last fall at Honda’s Marysville, Ohio facility, where the new Accord is being developed. More complete prototypes exist there, but this early example was outfitted with the latest specification of engine and transmission software, according to Martin. Because the prototype was an early build, however, its suspension tune, interior, and technology features were still just placeholders — our evaluation was focused on the engine and transmission. As for the new exterior and interior styling of the 2018 Accord, Honda says we’ll see more of that in the coming weeks.

We had just two laps of the 2.5-mile banked oval at Honda’s Tochigi R&D center to test the upcoming Accord’s highest-performance locomotion system. While we weren’t allowed on the banking, we didn’t really need it — the Accord still hit an easy 120 mph straight out of the pits. From a 25-mph pit exit, the turbocharged four-cylinder exhibited only minimal lag, building boost pressure and torque smoothly and quickly as we accelerated onto the track. The 10-speed auto’s function was so smooth as to be transparent. Left to its own devices, the transmission’s function is all but unnoticeable in normal acceleration and deceleration at city and highway speeds.

The Sport Mode button in the center console sharpens up the Accord’s responses for a spirited drive — or an aggressive Monday morning commute.

Honda hasn’t disclosed the power rating for the new turbo 2.0-liter, but my highly unscientific seat-of-the-pants feel says it’s somewhere around the 250-260 hp mark, with similar figures for torque output. Peak torque seems to arrive around 1,500 rpm, with power output at apparently constant levels from 3,000-5,000 rpm. Those figures compare well with the outgoing V-6’s 278 hp and 252 lb-ft of torque, and that’s before you take into account that the V-6’s peak torque doesn’t arrive until 4,900 rpm and peak horsepower at 6,200 rpm. The turbocharged engine should deliver more low-end torque, and therefore quicker acceleration in everyday situations.

In its final form, the Accord’s V-6 engine was equipped not only with the i-VTEC variable camshaft profile system, but with Variable Cylinder Management (VCM) which deactivates three cylinders in light-load situations, resulting in EPA gas mileage ratings of up to 21 mpg city, 33 mpg highway, and 25 mpg combined when paired with its six-speed automatic transmission. The new four-cylinder should easily beat those ratings, thanks not only to its smaller-displacement, turbocharged nature, but also the addition of the new 10-speed automatic transmission and whatever improvements to aerodynamics and/or weight Honda makes with the rest of the 2018 Accord’s design.

As important as the outright performance of the new 2.0-liter turbo, however, is the very fact of its existence, replacing the V-6 and moving the Accord to an entirely turbocharged lineup in its non-hybrid models. Honda, long an innovator in the marriage of performance and efficiency in naturally aspirated engines, has been slow to adopt across-the-board turbocharging in comparison to its competition — in part because of the strengths of its naturally aspirated engine development. With the move to smaller-displacement turbo engines on the Accord in addition to the Civic, Honda is signaling its intent to move toward turbocharging for even more of its models in coming years.

The 2018 Honda Accord will be built at the company’s Marysville, Ohio plant, while its 2.0-liter and 1.5-liter turbo four-cylinders will be built at Honda’s engine plant in Anna, Ohio. The 10-speed transmission will be built at Honda’s Tallapoosa, Georgia plant. The 2018 Honda Accord will arrive at American dealers this fall.
 
I call this bull. I would love a SH-AWD on an Accord. :)

Front-wheel drive is the only option for the 2018 Accord, says American Honda’s regulatory, legal, and technology communications manager Chris Martin, because customers who want all-wheel drive also tend to want the higher ride height and ground clearance of a crossover — and Honda makes plenty of those already.
 
I call this bull. I would love a SH-AWD on an Accord. :)

Front-wheel drive is the only option for the 2018 Accord, says American Honda’s regulatory, legal, and technology communications manager Chris Martin, because customers who want all-wheel drive also tend to want the higher ride height and ground clearance of a crossover — and Honda makes plenty of those already.
Why put the money into a sedan to make it AWD when they are already losing 18% of sales compared to last year (overall sedan in the US)? They need to make it more attractive to the market by making it sportier, hence the 20 inch wheels, with a lower and wider stance and a focus of reducing weight to increase handling. Not by trying to beat the CUVs at their own game.
 
Discussion starter · #4 ·
I call this bull. I would love a SH-AWD on an Accord. :)

Front-wheel drive is the only option for the 2018 Accord, says American Honda’s regulatory, legal, and technology communications manager Chris Martin, because customers who want all-wheel drive also tend to want the higher ride height and ground clearance of a crossover — and Honda makes plenty of those already.
Subaru is perhaps the only manufacturer with record sales increases year over year for the last 5 years. My next car is likely going to be a Legacy in no small part due to AWD.

You should get a job in Washington Mr Martin: Customers who want AWD want better traction. Customers who want a higher ride height want an SUV some of which have AWD or FWD like your Pilot and RDX/MDX as well as the Explorer, Lexus RX, and several Korean offerings, et.al. Ride height is not necessarily connected to AWD, you should know that. Subaru, Audi, BMW, MB, GM, Ford, and Hyundai sedans all have "normal" ride heights with their excellent AWD systems in place.
 
Why put the money into a sedan to make it AWD when they are already losing 18% of sales compared to last year (overall sedan in the US)? They need to make it more attractive to the market by making it sportier, hence the 20 inch wheels, with a lower and wider stance and a focus of reducing weight to increase handling. Not by trying to beat the CUVs at their own game.
AWD improves traction and driving dynamics or Honda wouldn't put it in its Acura line up. In cornering, it makes them feel more like RWD's than FWD's.

Most CUVs' AWD are crappier systems unlike the performance oriented SH-AWD with torque vectoring.
 
Discussion starter · #7 ·
Why put the money into a sedan to make it AWD when they are already losing 18% of sales compared to last year (overall sedan in the US)? They need to make it more attractive to the market by making it sportier, hence the 20 inch wheels, with a lower and wider stance and a focus of reducing weight to increase handling. Not by trying to beat the CUVs at their own game.
Reduce weight and offer 20 inch wheels. These two things are not compatible. Even with very expensive forged wheels that may weigh the same as 18" alloys, the tires are still much heavier. Manufacturers are going with capless fuel filling (thanks Ford) which saves weight and money only to gain with big fat wheels and tires. 18" is fine with me unless I have super car.
 
Subaru is perhaps the only manufacturer with record sales increases year over year for the last 5 years. My next car is likely going to be a Legacy in no small part due to AWD.

You should get a job in Washington Mr Martin: Customers who want AWD want better traction. Customers who want a higher ride height want an SUV some of which have AWD or FWD like your Pilot and RDX/MDX as well as the Explorer, Lexus RX, and several Korean offerings, et.al. Ride height is not necessarily connected to AWD, you should know that. Subaru, Audi, BMW, MB, GM, Ford, and Hyundai sedans all have "normal" ride heights with their excellent AWD systems in place.
I suspect the real story is they have to have something that differentiates Acura from Honda.

AWD improves traction and driving dynamics or Honda wouldn't put it in its Acura line up. In cornering, it makes them feel more like RWD's than FWD's.

Most CUVs' AWD are crappier systems unlike the performance oriented SH-AWD with torque vectoring.
Great points. Which is why I think Mr. Martin's explanation is a load of BS. Honda knows AWD in a sport sedan is the best handling drivetrain option, but they want to push that customer up to the more expensive Acura.
 
Here's a similar article:


I still find it very odd that Honda’s offering the Accord with a 6-speed manual transmission. Then again, I don’t have their market research, so who am I to argue with their offering decision.

https://www.slashgear.com/2018-hond...2018-honda-accord-first-drive-prototype-2-liter-turbocharged-10-speed-10488126/

I like that. :smile

Thanks, Honda, even though I probably won't buy until the 11th generation.


After dropping way down to 35 mph, I attempted to speed up again as fast as possible; this, though, is where a turbo engine mated with a 10-speed runs into an annoyance.

While the engine may be ready to speed up, it’s still waiting for the gears to drop from the higher overdrive ratios.

This is why I hate automatic transmissions. :thumbsdow
 
Discussion starter · #10 ·
I suspect the real story is they have to have something that differentiates Acura from Honda.



Great points. Which is why I think Mr. Martin's explanation is a load of BS. Honda knows AWD in a sport sedan is the best handling drivetrain option, but they want to push that customer up to the more expensive Acura.
Indeed, they differentiated Acura several years ago by putting an ugly beak on the front end. Not as bad as that maw on the Lexus which is a cross between the Preadator and a '61 Plymouth.

Pushing up market is the ultimate goal. "Mo money". For years you couldn't get Xenons on a VW but you could on an Audi just like Honda vis a vis Acura for several years.
 
3. Rumors of the demise of the manual transmission are greatly exaggerated. It survives (I know of one member who will be greatly disappointed)
You made my day.:lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
  • Like
Reactions: II Kings 9:20
I'm thrilled. I've owned 6 NA manual Accords in my life, going back to a 3rd gen LXi coupe in the 80s up to my current 8th gen 6-6 coupe. While I'm one of the worlds biggest fans of Honda's NA engines and manual transmissions, the idea of a 2.0 turbo manual Accord is pretty freaking cool. I'm a tinkerer, so I can't wait to see what the aftermarket tuning options become for the 10th gen. I'm optimistic that this might be the best Accord yet.
 
Atta boy long_road ^^^ ! I tend to not second-guess Honda on the Accord. Acura, yes, but Accord no. Part of the coolness of Accords is the wealth of aftermarket options.
 
Why put the money into a sedan to make it AWD when they are already losing 18% of sales compared to last year
Perhaps the absence of an AWD option is a contributing factor for the Accord's sales decline?

I've purchased (6) Accords since 1988, but my 2016 Touring may be the last one I'll buy. I have ~19K miles on the Accord and enjoy driving it very much.

Perhaps it is just an "old-man-thing," but I am looking at luxury class vehicles for the 1st time and some of the design/engineering decisions Honda has been making lately with it's fleet of vehicles is "speeding" my decision to look at alternatives, for the 1st time in nearly 30 years.

Living in the cold/snowy Northeast a vehicle equipped w/AWD is great to have during the winter months.

If BMW can offer a sedan w/an AWD option, why can't Honda?

Their primary AWD options: CRV & Pilot, are both mi$$e$ IMO. BTW... I own a 2016 not-so Elite that I don't care for too much, another BIG turn-off.
 
If BMW can offer a sedan w/an AWD option, why can't Honda?
They do; they're called "Acura". Remember, BMW sells luxury-class vehicles, so does Acura (kind of). There's no AWD Camry, either. With the exception of Subaru I don't think any of the middle-class brands offer AWD sedans. You want AWD in a Sedan, you need to go one class up. Or buy a Subie.
 
They do; they're called "Acura". Remember, BMW sells luxury-class vehicles, so does Acura (kind of). There's no AWD Camry, either. With the exception of Subaru I don't think any of the middle-class brands offer AWD sedans. You want AWD in a Sedan, you need to go one class up. Or buy a Subie.
Ford Fusion

Perhaps the absence of an AWD option is a contributing factor for the Accord's sales decline?

I've purchased (6) Accords since 1988, but my 2016 Touring may be the last one I'll buy. I have ~19K miles on the Accord and enjoy driving it very much.

Perhaps it is just an "old-man-thing," but I am looking at luxury class vehicles for the 1st time and some of the design/engineering decisions Honda has been making lately with it's fleet of vehicles is "speeding" my decision to look at alternatives, for the 1st time in nearly 30 years.

Living in the cold/snowy Northeast a vehicle equipped w/AWD is great to have during the winter months.

If BMW can offer a sedan w/an AWD option, why can't Honda?

Their primary AWD options: CRV & Pilot, are both mi$$e$ IMO. BTW... I own a 2016 not-so Elite that I don't care for too much, another BIG turn-off.
What about an RDX if you want to give Honda one last chance?
 
They do; they're called "Acura". Remember, BMW sells luxury-class vehicles, so does Acura (kind of). There's no AWD Camry, either. With the exception of Subaru I don't think any of the middle-class brands offer AWD sedans. You want AWD in a Sedan, you need to go one class up. Or buy a Subie.
I am inclined to purchase a luxury automobile and I suppose comparing a Honda to a BMW isn't fair. Honda appears to be moving towards the mass-market more now than ever before (some might say haven't they always). No AWD, no V6 what else will Honda stop offering?

What about an RDX if you want to give Honda one last chance?
The RDX is ok, but lacks some key features it should have compared to the competition in it's class.

I've owned a 2016 Pilot since June 2015 and I'm really turned-off by it's ZF 9-speed AT, awful head unit, lack of a padded center console plus a number of other negatives w/this vehicle.
 
They do; they're called "Acura". Remember, BMW sells luxury-class vehicles, so does Acura (kind of). There's no AWD Camry, either. With the exception of Subaru I don't think any of the middle-class brands offer AWD sedans. You want AWD in a Sedan, you need to go one class up. Or buy a Subie.
I imagine a big part of the equation for BMW in making the AWD is that the 2wd is rear, rather fwd, and most folks from snowy regions would be too scared to drive rwd in bad conditions.

That said, I would absolutely have gotten an awd accord if they'd offered it. It didn't make sense (for me) to buy a crosstour or tsx wagon because they don't have the Sensing features, but those are some great cars, even if unpopular.
 
Living in the cold/snowy Northeast a vehicle equipped w/AWD is great to have during the winter months.

You could get better results with a set of snow tires. Even the least expensive set of winter tires on a front drive car will almost certainly give better traction in snow than AWD with all-season tires.

After years of driving on Wisconsin roads, I lost count of all the AWD/4WD SUVs that I have seen ditched off the road and/or overturned in heavy snowfall. On winter tires my old Accord Coupe cut through snow and ice like it was on rails. I expect the same results from the new one, and to me good tires are just like insurance to protect my investment.

Maybe AWD works better for high speed cornering on dry pavement, but many people have discovered the hard way that AWD is not a free pass to ignore the need to have appropriate tires for road conditions.
 
1 - 20 of 77 Posts